Skip to main content

Responsiveness

Responsiveness in healthcare affects optimal management, psychological safety, physical safety, customer service and quality. 

Responsiveness is often dropped, or not followed through, or placed as a one-time play. 


When considering others’ places and spaces, healthcare must anticipate that the gaps left by “no reply” get filled in. One way or another, a lack of response gets substituted. Often, misinformation gets deputized.


As healthcare becomes increasingly interested in “infodemics” [1] and misinformation, healthcare must first take responsibility and ownership of responsiveness. 


In others places and spaces, and in healthcare’s own, there must be ownership of: 

 

  • How often concerns are raised to the organization, and to global health, by experts in medical fields? In other fields?


  • How often concerns are raised by general members of the public? 


  • The types of concerns raised


  • Potential algorithms or classifications, so that critical reviews can occur in a timely fashion.


  • Responsible individuals or groups, and how the responsibility is managed.


  • Response time metrics, by follow through and reciprocated communication


  • Response time metrics, by how the cultural considerations should tailor response


  • Training and efforts around anticipatory response, with standards across cultures and tailored aspects for cultures


  • Criteria for advancing a concern or issue to a greater panel? Who determines or facilitates advancement of a concern and how is biased removed from decision-making?


  • Accountability to response failures, including public harm through the public’s definition of harm. 


Allowing a substitute in lieu of response is allowing intentional miscommunication. There should be no expert lecture on infodemics without first accounting for responsiveness.


Responsiveness can be examined with competence to one another’s place and space. This should be an ongoing, evaluated accountability for national and global health agencies.  



  1. https://www.who.int/news/item/01-12-2021-5th-who-infodemic-management-conference-towards-measuring-the-burden-of-infodemic

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oxygen

Keeping it simple for oxygen coordination is best accomplished when we're welcomed in.  It’s good to support global leadership in medical oxygen supply management for underserved communities and countries in need.  It’s great to support efforts that strengthen individual country leadership toward national strategies on medical oxygen supply management.   Both require some tread into a country’s vulnerabilities on medical needs.  Let’s tread meaningfully and in a way that assures a welcome back.  Detail the coordinating agencies or government departments responsible for medical oxygen supply receipt. Meet with health administrators.  Detail a country’s current policies, compare with a global review and detail opportunities for policies on oxygen management. Is medical oxygen supply and/or maintenance an ongoing regulatory component within a country? What would it take to sharpen regulatory efforts? Is medical oxygen supply a component to ongoing emergen...

Thankfully Sharing

Appreciation for international peers shows up with more than words. Perhaps we extend a cultural competence partnership. Perhaps we share business. For some of us, collective advocacy for a collective healthier public messages this gratitude.  Though it feels good to work alongside one another, it should also feel good to rest alongside one another.  And today, restful and productive, I share words in my space.   This is my space, and I am thankful for you here.  Because you share your countries and worlds and space with me, I thank you.  Happy Thanksgiving, friends all over the world.

Removing paternalism in pandemic declarations: respect with place and space

  The world has a sophisticated infectious disease, epidemiological and technological intersection. Multiple funding sources remove the risk of total epidemiological collapse. And, the epidemiological reporting mechanisms are familiar to one another worldwide.  There is enough structure to advance emergencies in infectious disease beyond medicine’s paternalistic culture. While the remainder of paternalism in medicine will take collaborative, significant energy to transform, we are fortunate that infectious disease emergencies are already energized.  Medicine’s inability to learn from the H1N1 geopolitical disagreements around definitions of outbreak, epidemic and pandemic spilled over into full failure of the COVID pandemic call. Delayed infectious disease definitions matter. From the start, failure in identification diminished confidence in medical science.  We should set a confident tone and better trajectory for future infectious disease emergencies, and remove th...