Skip to main content

Mortality Data Accuracy Aligns With Hope

Mortality data accuracy is a cornerstone of pandemic management, and it is a cornerstone of any health issue. COVID data inaccuracy offers tremendous opportunity to improve healthcare epidemiology sustainably. And we can improve only when welcomed into one another's national space and place.  

Mortality accuracy is challenging due to statistical logistics and geopolitics; it is also challenging due to sociocultural considerations. 

We don't really know how each affects accuracy of the mortality data. We don't know the weight of each consideration because we haven't properly assessed them.  

  • We have addressed some solutions for statistical logistics with COVID, such as improving real time data, use of EHR, use of cemetery and cremation data, use of excess death or other metrics, consistency to death definitions and strengthened regional epidemiology. 
  • We have addressed few solutions for geopolitics related to COVID. Most solutions rely on normalizing the experience of a pandemic alongside a world health campaign that unites.  
  • We have addressed no solutions for sociocultural considerations. We should not begin to solve for issues with causes we have not yet analyzed, anyway. 

Numerical metrics are uncomplicated by emotion or imperfect behavior, and thus numerical metrics will never be able to paint these latter two considerations sharply.  

While we await analyses and solutions for geopolitical and sociocultural culprits of inaccurate data, we can tap the compassion that creates successful interpersonal relationships. 

To avoid tangents, let's be frank: Sometimes political figures do not want to appear inept, regardless of the expected failures of a global disaster. Conversely, sometimes those responsible for large populations do not want populations to face problems that have no solutions. 

Countries without access to resources have less solutions available to their populations. And when there are no solutions to offer, those in charge may or may not want to disclose the entirety of a problem. 

We must improve resource distribution to help solve for hope. In this advancement, we can begin an improved interpersonal relationship on behalf of data accuracy ambassadorship. 

We can succeed with interpersonal relationships for best epidemiology; we can aspire toward improved sociocultural understanding. We can do this best by offering hope through resources.

  • Communicate the importance of accurate mortality data, as well as hospitalization data, to country leadership. 
  • Determine any third party analytics that can be offered, or will be used, to assess accuracy. Be upfront on this use, internationally. Evidence of Excess Deaths, evidence with satellites or crematoriums, evidence with successful prediction models should also be disclosed. Rather than back any leadership into a corner, this evidence should be disclosed with honesty over empathetic concern. 
  • Ask for country needs around epidemiology and follow through with resources to support epidemiology. 
  • Ask for country needs with vaccine resources, and follow through with vaccine resources. 
  • Ask for country needs with medical supply and therapeutics, and follow through with these resources. 
  • Ask for a collegial approach to mortality data as the resource follow through continues. 
  • Set data accuracy as a global health operational indicator. If our global healthcare cannot meet the needs of a country during a communicable disease, and if that country chooses not to disclose mortality data because it does not have resources to solve for hope, global healthcare is under-performing. 

Mortality data accuracy is a cornerstone of pandemic management, and it is a cornerstone of any health issue. COVID data inaccuracy offers tremendous opportunity to improve healthcare epidemiology sustainably. And we can improve only when welcomed into one another's national space and place.  

We must improve resource distribution to help solve for hope. In this advancement, we can begin an improved interpersonal relationship on behalf of data accuracy ambassadorship. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oxygen

Keeping it simple for oxygen coordination is best accomplished when we're welcomed in.  It’s good to support global leadership in medical oxygen supply management for underserved communities and countries in need.  It’s great to support efforts that strengthen individual country leadership toward national strategies on medical oxygen supply management.   Both require some tread into a country’s vulnerabilities on medical needs.  Let’s tread meaningfully and in a way that assures a welcome back.  Detail the coordinating agencies or government departments responsible for medical oxygen supply receipt. Meet with health administrators.  Detail a country’s current policies, compare with a global review and detail opportunities for policies on oxygen management. Is medical oxygen supply and/or maintenance an ongoing regulatory component within a country? What would it take to sharpen regulatory efforts? Is medical oxygen supply a component to ongoing emergen...
Post a Comment
Read more

Collaboration

A leadership presence at the table means little without mutual respect and a consistent, reliable, collaborative presence in one another’s space. Healthcare leadership does require influential action, not just parental correspondence or command.  As global health improves on leadership and collaboration in an increasingly small world, we can help balance global health work for maximum influence and leadership presence. *List and detail international health agencies, by charitable organization and governing status. Detail the duplication, reach and leadership. Involve agencies together, through liaisons. *Evaluate world health organization (WHO) and other agency credibility, respect and influence. Evaluate this by peer organization, interindustry organization and by country. Ask for survey creation and feedback assistance. Respect unbiased response.  * Dedicate a strategic plan to extend global health into national health and partner agency collaboration. Create action with urg...
Post a Comment
Read more

Responsiveness

Responsiveness in healthcare affects optimal management, psychological safety, physical safety, customer service and quality.  Responsiveness is often dropped, or not followed through, or placed as a one-time play.  When considering others’ places and spaces, healthcare must anticipate that the gaps left by “no reply” get filled in. One way or another, a lack of response gets substituted. Often, misinformation gets deputized. As healthcare becomes increasingly interested in “infodemics” [1] and misinformation, healthcare must first take responsibility and ownership of responsiveness.  In others places and spaces, and in healthcare’s own, there must be ownership of:    How often concerns are raised to the organization, and to global health, by experts in medical fields? In other fields? How often concerns are raised by general members of the public?  The types of concerns raised Potential algorithms or classifications, so that critical reviews can occur in a...
Post a Comment
Read more