Skip to main content

International Health Regulations

 The International Health Regulations (IHR) provide a framework and predictable structure for countries. Implementation of core components is measured, preferably annually, and the response rate in 2018 was a successful 96%.

In October 2021, WHO referenced IHR when formulating 7 recommendations for resilience in health [1]

With IHR, global health sets unspoken expectations. However, we cannot anticipate IHR to be consistently interpreted, let alone adopted and accepted as necessary, without respect for individualism in countries. 

Completing a survey as a side thought versus completing a survey with full investment in healthcare improvement are two very different activities. Let’s do better to ensure full investment of IHR with every country, by being welcomed into countries.


In their space:  

* Create focused leadership groups with the SPAR and survey responders, grouped by country and region. https://extranet.who.int/e-spar/#submission-details

* Create focused leadership groups for those not responding to the survey; ask for country representatives with response failures. 

* Cultivate a team of national champions. 

* Task countries with IHR components, indicators and attribute review. Which metrics are deemed unnecessary? What metrics are missing and should be included? Once this feedback has been received, make sincere changes and utilize evidence for support. [2] 

* Provide a liaison to support epidemiological needs.

* Provide a liaison to support cost analyses. What are costs necessary to implement the indicators? How can funding be detailed in ask and supported through global networks? 

* Be assertive and respectful regarding national security. What are the national security concerns to data reveal and how can countries work to assure and address issues?

* Gain insight on what professional credentials for IHR representation would look like, by country. 

*Assess the progress of IHR work by asking countries directly. The 2/3 of IHR-tasked countries  still unable to perform the main functions of assess, detect, and respond (about 132 of the 196 countries) should be addressed. What are recommendations for an international, coordinated strategy, nearly twenty years after initiation (2005), to help these ~132 countries?  [3]

* Validate the support that has been reportedly offered. Ask these countries about the support offered, and whether or not it has been offered and/or received without alternative agenda attached. 

* Determine how countries use IHR data and how they rely on the Global Health Observatory.  Ask them for unbiased, sincere response. 

* Determine methods for verification and validation. How can leadership confirm the responses are reliable, consistently interpreted and accurate with a respectful tone? How can countries prepare to receive feedback with professionalism?

* Clarify how regional support can provide efficiency for multiple countries. [4]

* Clarify how ongoing education could be conducted alongside a global peer network of IHR champions.

* Speak with actions, not words. If we ask for honesty and transparency, reciprocate. If we ask for unbiased effort and response, do not retaliate.

We can refresh and maximize the IHR framework only once welcomed into countries’ space. 



1. https://www.who.int/news/item/19-10-2021-who-s-7-policy-recommendations-on-building-resilient-health-systems

2. https://extranet.who.int/e-spar/#capacity-score

3. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html

4. https://extranet.who.int/e-spar/#capacity-score

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oxygen

Keeping it simple for oxygen coordination is best accomplished when we're welcomed in.  It’s good to support global leadership in medical oxygen supply management for underserved communities and countries in need.  It’s great to support efforts that strengthen individual country leadership toward national strategies on medical oxygen supply management.   Both require some tread into a country’s vulnerabilities on medical needs.  Let’s tread meaningfully and in a way that assures a welcome back.  Detail the coordinating agencies or government departments responsible for medical oxygen supply receipt. Meet with health administrators.  Detail a country’s current policies, compare with a global review and detail opportunities for policies on oxygen management. Is medical oxygen supply and/or maintenance an ongoing regulatory component within a country? What would it take to sharpen regulatory efforts? Is medical oxygen supply a component to ongoing emergen...
Post a Comment
Read more

Experts and Regulation

For all the global health coordination, and all the international research collaboration, there is no movement toward scope of practice, labor regulation, prescribing regulation or biotechnological responsibility standardization.  We should encourage measured progress toward accountability in medicine regulation, and we should do so with countries at the table.   What are the medical professions, credentials, approved education and scope of practice in healthcare, per country? What are the community healthcare worker (CHW) roles if allowed, per country? What would countries like to see adjusted or mirrored?  Which procedures are allowed for each healthcare profession? What are the rationales, inclusive of supply and demand and access issues?  What are the differences in approvals and guidelines for medicine safety, and for who can prescribe what? What is the healthcare political climate in various countries and how does this affect decision making? What analytic...
Post a Comment
Read more

Energy in healthcare, welcomed in

To assure adequate energy and electricity for healthcare worldwide, those assisting first need to be welcomed in.  To assure energy reduction and efficiency in healthcare, those involved must feel welcomed at the table. Here are a few ways we can ask for a welcome, as well as welcome others in:  *Structure international and national authorities to healthcare energy assurance. Assess for gaps at the table, including when partnerships develop for global assessments. [1} *Structure the assessments of energy in healthcare. How is adequacy measured? How does a community define if they have enough energy and how are the definitions of quality of care mismatched?  *Assess current response. How are philanthropic and nonprofit partnerships defining, assessing and responding to lack of energy in healthcare [2,3,4,5]? Where are the disconnects and mismatches? *Assess for understanding of medical equipment and use within evidence-based guidelines. Where are these facilities in adopt...
Post a Comment
Read more