Skip to main content

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene in one another's healthcare space

Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH), while recognized as a necessity, requires acceptance by the healthcare team. As we work toward universal WASH, and as we work toward standards in attention health delivery process measures and outcome measures, we should work toward culturally appropriate design.  

WASH monitoring reveals that 25% of health care facilities have no basic water services, 10% of health care facilities globally have no sanitation services and one in three do not have adequate facilities to clean hands at the point of care. One in three health care facilities do not segregate waste safely [1]. Advancing WASH in healthcare across the world is an urgent necessity, and global strategic plans are forming. 

Care is affected for the 712 million people who have no access to water when they use health care facilities, yet we have not fully invested in understanding the effects. The reality of WASH inaccess also affects how current care is perceived and how current norms are ingrained.  

To maximize our global efforts with adequate water, sanitation and hygiene in healthcare facilities across all countries, we should simultaneously strive to be welcomed into others’ space. 


Understand where we are, as a world, with WASH and healthcare

*Fund the collection and comparison of: healthcare operations, delivery, equipment inventory and use, labor scope of practice, health outcomes and other considerations that inaccess to WASH has altered.

*Fund data analytics of outcomes alongside WASH progress. Understand the impact of WASH objectively.


Understand where countries are, as their own country, with WASH and healthcare

*Survey populations, government leaders and healthcare facilities with standard questionnaires. What do countries feel they need in WASH supplies? How do they feel access to WASH or inaccess to WASH affects health? What are the obstacles, barriers and strengths these countries have for WASH implementation? What do global strategies call for with WASH that countries may feel unnecessary or excessive? What are the major workarounds for facilities with WASH inaccess, and how have these workarounds hindered or supported patient safety? Survey these populations, and understand them.

*Analyze and report on country perspective. What are common workarounds, what are the reported outcomes and what are the objective outcomes? How can outcome data and epidemiology be strengthened, and how can this support be communicated and be welcomed? 

*Survey countries to gain insight on cultural norms. What are norms that WASH has not yet disrupted, what norms is WASH currently disrupting, and what norms have WASH modified? What are norms that continue to be disrupted by inaccess to WASH? 

*Dialogue and plan for logistics of WASH design, including labor, education, materials, ongoing maintenance, sustained finance and supportive infrastructure. Ask the countries what they need. Ask for these countries to partner in leadership of design, and designate liaisons to help see it through.




  1. https://washdata.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/WHO-UNICEF-2020-wash-in-hcf.pdf

  2. https://washinhcf.org/resources/

  3. https://washdata.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/WHO-UNICEF-2020-wash-in-hcf.pdf

  4. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017542

  5. https://savethewater.org/water-sanitation-hygiene-wash-6-ways-you-can-help/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMItZqV0fbb8wIVqQytBh0k8QCwEAAYAiAAEgL70_D_BwE

  6. file:///C:/Users/D535864/Downloads/WHO-CED-PHE-WSH-18.03-eng.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mortality Data Accuracy Aligns With Hope

Mortality data accuracy is a cornerstone of pandemic management, and it is a cornerstone of any health issue. COVID data inaccuracy offers tremendous opportunity to improve healthcare epidemiology sustainably. And we can improve only when welcomed into one another's national space and place.   Mortality accuracy is challenging due to statistical logistics and geopolitics; it is also challenging due to sociocultural considerations.  We don't really know how each affects accuracy of the mortality data . We don't know the weight of each consideration because we haven't properly assessed them.   We have addressed some solutions for statistical logistics with COVID, such as improving real time data, use of EHR, use of cemetery and cremation data, use of excess death or other metrics, consistency to death definitions and strengthened regional epidemiology.  We have addressed few solutions for geopolitics related to COVID. Most solutions rely on normalizing the ex...
Post a Comment
Read more

Oxygen

Keeping it simple for oxygen coordination is best accomplished when we're welcomed in.  It’s good to support global leadership in medical oxygen supply management for underserved communities and countries in need.  It’s great to support efforts that strengthen individual country leadership toward national strategies on medical oxygen supply management.   Both require some tread into a country’s vulnerabilities on medical needs.  Let’s tread meaningfully and in a way that assures a welcome back.  Detail the coordinating agencies or government departments responsible for medical oxygen supply receipt. Meet with health administrators.  Detail a country’s current policies, compare with a global review and detail opportunities for policies on oxygen management. Is medical oxygen supply and/or maintenance an ongoing regulatory component within a country? What would it take to sharpen regulatory efforts? Is medical oxygen supply a component to ongoing emergen...
Post a Comment
Read more

Validation of Trust in Laboratory Science

Biomedical laboratory processes should be safe, with safety reporting assured in every space and place.  Global coordination of biomedical laboratory safety should include representative voices, tied to accountability, so that individual places and spaces are at the table. Approve the risk assessments through third party review. Most governments, administrations, organizations and healthcare guidance (including WHO) assign the responsibility of Risk Assessments to the Biomedical Laboratories. If there are standards to risk assessments, and standards to operations in laboratory science, a third party should be  weighing in on risk. Risk based on animals, vectors and biotissue studied, risk based on diseases studied, risk based on prior and current laboratory professional behaviors, risk based on facility design and risk based on clinical staff are all capable of third party analysis in conjunction with self analysis. Ask facilities and government liaisons what they would like i...
Post a Comment
Read more